Antibody Steering
Antigen-conditioned antibody language modeling and guided HCDR3 infilling, with explicit tests for the limits of steering.
Overview
I am building an antibody language-modeling stack for targeted, antigen-conditioned HCDR3 editing. Rather than generate entire antibodies from scratch, the system first learns antibody sequence grammar from Observed Antibody Space data, refines paired heavy/light-chain representations, and then fuses them with antigen context for local infilling.
The current implementation includes OAS and antibody-antigen preprocessing, a dual-stream cross-attention model, real-label compatibility training, and an HCDR3 infiller that can optionally use a separate compatibility model to guide each residue choice.
Steering with an honest ceiling
Inference-time guidance can only reweight residues that the base model already considers plausible. The project therefore includes a reachability probe that measures whether the compatibility signal can meaningfully change a decision before spending compute on a guidance sweep. If the base policy assigns a useful residue effectively no probability, increasing the guidance strength cannot recover it.
That distinction keeps three ideas separate: guidance changes a sampling run, preference post-training would change the model’s weights, and sparse-feature methods may eventually help interpret what changed. The latter two remain future directions until the antigen-conditioned policy passes independent evaluation gates.
Current focus
- leakage-aware preprocessing for OAS and antigen-specific antibody data,
- paired heavy/light and antibody-antigen representation learning,
- fixed- and variable-length HCDR3 infilling,
- guided generation and steering-reachability diagnostics, and
- reproducible experiment, checkpoint, and evaluation contracts.